Skip to content

Categories:

Chinese SNS Douban Raises Close to $10MM in Series B Round

The following is my latest post on Digital East Asia.

The recent Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) – China spat has made Chinese web news much less interesting to read lately, as there is a flood of officially-toned articles criticizing Google and the US government (after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s Internet Freedom Address last week). And honestly, many Chinese netizens are perhaps fearful of tougher crackdowns from the government as a show of strength. It is therefore great news, then, to hear Douban raising close to $10MM in its Series B round of VC funding (via Chinabyte article, link in Chinese).

The Series B round of funding is led byTrustbridge Partners, founded by formerShanda Interactive Entertainment Ltd.((ADR) NASDAQ: SNDA) CFO Li Shujun in 2006, and Ceyuan Ventures, which invested $2MM in the Series A round in 2006.

Founded in 2005, Douban is China’s leading SNS when it comes to books, films and music – organized around such interests, it’s distinctively different from the other Chinese social networks (Renren – the college kids, Kaixin – casual games etc.). The crowd that Douban attracts may be smaller in size, but it is much more skewed towards the highly educated (and perhaps elitist) rising middle class, commonly termed “xiaozi” (literally meaning petty bourgeoisie). And since most topics are centered on the various arts, discussions are generally less sensitive, though Douban had to do some heavy self-censoring in the summer of 2009 to comply with the Chinese government’s regulations.

The site seems to have been picking up significantly over the half year, with over 33MM registered IDs now, versus only 10MM in September 2009. This could partly be due to a partnership withTencent Holdings Ltd.’s (HKG: 0700) popular IM platform QQ, where Douban was listed in the books section. However, like most SNSes, Douban is still on the path to profitability. The site currently generates income from book recommendations (linking to online retailers such as Dangdang and Amazon Joyo), ticket booking services and brand advertising (Ford, Converse, Ray-ban etc., full list of brands here).

  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in VC, web.

Tagged with , , .


Some Thoughts on Google’s “Prisoner’s Dilemma” in China

The following is my latest post on Digital East Asia.

I’ve just been on a Berkeley Haas MBA student trek to China, where one of the companies we visited was Google China (before the recent news broke). Having talked with several Googlers and also pondered on the issue for a bit on my flight back to Berkeley, I’d like to share a few thoughts on the still developing showdown regarding Google Inc.’s (NASDAQ: GOOG) Chinese operations:

  1. As regards the abstract and philosophical issue of “what is the right thing for Google to do” — “abide by Chinese law” or stand by its “do no evil” mantra? — there is actually no right answer to this question. First off, most governments in the world adopt some form of censorship, and China is not the only country where Google has to abide by local law. Chinese netizens have pointedly dug out the 2008 news story in which Google assisted the Indian government in arresting an Indian man. Secondly, the argument made by Google 4 years ago when entering China (ie – that offering Chinese netizens access to limited information is better than no information) is still just as valid as the moral claims Google is now stating when threatening to exit China. As a poor analogy, should a man steal from a food bank if he sees lots of hungry people on the street? The act of stealing itself may be repulsive, but does the end (saving people’s lives) justify the means? I honestly believe this is an issue which you can side with either way and there is no right or wrong. Furthermore, a cyber-attack is illegal by any country’s law, whereas what is censored and what is not censored can be different due to country-specific issues like religion or in the case of China, politics. So for Google to use the hacker attacks as justification that it can’t tolerate Chinese censorship anymore is somewhat dubious, since this is not exactly the same issue.
  2. Secondly, this confrontation helps highlight the different cultural differences that are important in business in the US and in China. On our recent student trek, every company (whether multinational or local) emphasized the huge difference in business culture – “it’s not right or wrong, it’s just different.” What I mean by this is that Google’s going public has made the Chinese government lose face, and this will only result in a lose-lose situation. If Google was pissed about the hacker attacks, it should have escalated that to the relevant US government agencies, and therefore go through official diplomatic channels. From the Chinese perspective, by breaching the regular channels and creating such a PR issue, Google has shown that it has no respect for China, its government, or even its people. Just a quick glance at my friends’ statuses on Kaixin, the most popular Chinese SNS, and I can see just as many people who are sad and “mourning” for Google as there are who are angry and skeptical of Google claiming the moral high ground (“just leave”). Google has arguably alienated some Chinese netizens by escalating this political disagreement into a high-profile media story.
  3. Thirdly, what is the fallout? A few possible scenarios are as follows (my own speculation, neither confirmed nor denied by my chats with Googlers):
  • “Worst case” scenario: Google China is completely disbanded, all .cn services sare hut down, and all employees are let go (or for some people, offered transfers to the US); the aftermath is very likely that the Chinese government will block Google.com for an extended period of time to recover its lost face. Absolutely worst possible outcome, termed “lose-lose-lose” by the WSJ editorial.
  • “Moderate case” scenario: Google’s .cn services are shut down, but Google China’s engineering staff is kept on, in a pure R&D center (think Microsoft Research Asia). Some form of comprise will be reached between the Chinese government and Google, and Google.com will remain accessible but prone to occasional blocks in China.
  • “Best case” scenario: Business as usual. Somehow all parties get out of this political row with something to show, and everyone can forget that the whole thing even happened. This is only “best” in that we can go back to our prior state, not necessarily “best” in the moral and philosophical debate about censorship etc.

In closing, I’d like to say that the current events are unfortunate by any measure, since the biggest losers potentially are the Chinese netizens. Competition is necessary for a healthy market, and letting Baidu, Inc. ((ADR) NASDAQ: BIDU) own the Chinese search market is just as bad as letting Google own the US search market. This is why I root for Google in China and Microsoft Corporation’s (NASDAQ: MSFT) Bing in the US.

  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in web.

Tagged with , , .


RUMOR: China Mobile CEO visits Tencent; Talk of Acquisition Spreads

The following is my latest post on Digital East Asia.

Warning – this one is straight from the rumor mills, but has been reposted on more than 3 dozen Chinese news sites according to Baidu News Search. The original source is Chinese IT news portal DoNews (in Chinese).

China Mobile Ltd.’s ((ADR) NYSE: CHL) CEO Wang Jianzhou and a team of senior executives visited Tencent Holdings Ltd. (HKG: 0700) headquarters on Dec 31st, 2009, and were received by Tencent President Martin Lau Chi Ping.  According to QQ.com (owned by Tencent), the Tencent management team showcased their R&D and applications in wireless Internet; whereas DoNews speculates that such a visit cannot just be for some demos, but is in fact to re-initiate discussions of China Mobile acquiring Tencent. According to an “industry insider” (DoNews’ anonymous source), China Mobile has been interested in buying Tencent ever since the era of its previous CEO Wang Xiaochu (who stepped down in late 2004).

It’s true that China Mobile has always seemed very serious about getting into the content side of the business, and is determined to be not just the “dumb pipe”. It developed in-house Fetion, which is an also-ran in the instant messaging market whose main value proposition is free text messaging to mobile phones. That feature helped the service gain a decent number of users, bust I guess most users are like me – I only log on when I need to send some text messages to my friends and I log off immediately afterwards (you get SMS notification if others reply). Buying Tencent would obviously give China Mobile a range of extremely profitable Internet properties and help it achieve its ambition in content; the doubt would be whether there could be any synergies actually realized – the AOL-Time Warner deal immediately jumps to mind.

Taking a step back, the high profile visit at least signals that some form of discussions is ongoing, and there will probably be at least some partnership deals coming soon. It will be interesting to see what comes out of this in the near future.

  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in mobile, web.

Tagged with , , .


Chinese Government Finally Enters Online Video Market with State-Owned CNTV.cn

The following is my latest post on Digital East Asia.

cntv logoChina’s online space has long been one of rare industries where there is not big state-owned players present – Baidu, Inc. ((ADR) NASDAQ: BIDU),Alibaba.com Limited (HKSE: 1688), Tencent Holdings Limited(HKG: 0700(ADR) PINK: TCEHY), etc. are all private companies. People often speculate if and when this will change (just last night I had such a conversation with a friend who works in VC). Well, this has just become true for the online video sector.

China’s state-owned media giant China Central Television (CCTV) has just launched China Network Television (CNTV.cn), which is an aggressive foray into the online video space by any measure. Previously, CCTV has been content with offering ad-hoc streaming of important programs on its website and partnering with internet properties such as Sina. CNTV is a dramatic development as it is essentially trying to move all of CCTV’s content online (think Hulu, but 10 times more aggressive).

The site, which will officially launch on Monday, Dec. 28th, is already accessible. At launch, the site offers 5 distinct “channels”:

  1. a 24-hour news channel,
  2. a sports channel,
  3. a general entertainment channel,
  4. a user-generated-content (UGC) channel (think Youtube clone), and
  5. a video-on-demand (VOD) channel.

In addition, CBOX (in Chinese), a software client, is available for download (though right now the link seems to be broken, so I haven’t been able to test it).

The 24 hour news channel and the sports channel (titled “5+”, as CCTV5 is the sports channel under CCTV) require a plug-in to view. 5+ currently only has some ads (it’s 7am Monday as of this writing, so the channel hasn’t officially launched yet), whereas the news channel is currently streaming CCTV News. I think these two channels will offer some forms of original programming going forward, and not just stream TV content. I’m not sure if the plug-in is based on some form of P2P technology (as used by competitors PPLive and PPStream), but at 7am the news channel isn’t streaming that well, so there are some technical issues to resolve. The entertainment channel, the UGC channel and the VOD channel utilize Adobe Flash.

CNTV xiyou logoThe UGC channel, named CNTV Xiyou (grapefruit, I have no idea why it’s named as such…), looks and feels like any other online video site. As can be expected, there isn’t a lot of content right now, but I did see clips from other television stations uploaded – not sure how CNTV will handle piracy, but this will likely be a very sensitive issue due to CNTV’s state-owned background.

cntv bugu logoPersonally I found the VOD channel, CNTV Bugu (cuckoo, again, no idea why it’s titled this), to be the most interesting. The service has two components – a live component and a database of programs. Right now, live streaming of 51 TV channels (CCTV properties and a range of the most popular provincial channels such as Beijing TV) is available. For the database, it seems to be CCTV’s ambition to make all of its programming fully searchable and watchable online, and Bugu is the first step in that direction. The database has a impressive collection already – I just watched the 30-minute news from September 14th. There are also some films, courtesy of CCTV6 (the movie channel), for example All Quiet on the Western Front, though again there could be some copyright issues involved (when CCTV purchased the license for the film, did it also include online broadcasting rights?).

CNTV’s launch has serious implications for the space. It’s an aggressive entry into all the sectors of online video. While UGC sites like Tudou (in Chinese) and Youku (in Chinese) might feel the pain less (CNTV in this regard is just another Youtube clone; there is not differentiation – yet), properties like PPLive (which has recently renamed itself PPTV) and PPStream which heavily rely on traditional TV resources will certainly be strongly challenged. One of CNTV’s stated goals is to make CCTV’s 20 channels fully viewable online, and since CCTV is the monopolistic player in many fields (sports for example – there are few competitors to CCTV5), this will make CNTV the go-to property for a lot of viewers. Of course, a lot depends on the actual execution, but it’s safe to say that the landscape is about to change.

  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in web.

Tagged with , , , , , , , .


SARFT Clamps Down on P2P Sites in China, BTChina shuts Down, and VeryCD to Follow

The following is my latest post on Digital East Asia.

The recent weeks have been particularly hard for the web P2P community, with thePirate Bay shutting down and Mininova turning legal. The situation in China has taken a turn for the worse (if you’re a P2P user) also, as the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television (SARFT) has taken action against several P2P sites.

Among the casualties is BTChina, the largest torrent tracker in China. On Dec. 4th, netizens found that the website was inaccessible; the following day a short note appeared:

“BTChina has received notification from SARFT that as we don’t have a video license, our ICP registration with the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has been deleted, and we are shutting down.”

It’s worthy to note that the direct reason these sites are shutting down is that they don’t have licenses to distribute video online, not necessarily because of piracy. In the past few days, several rumors have been flying on the Chinese web regarding SARFT’s actions, including one which claimed that BTChina’s founder, Huang Xiwei, has been detained by the police. This was later proved to be false (link in Chinese), as Dai Yunjie, the founder of VeryCD (the popular Chinese site for eMule downloads), called Huang immediately after he saw the web discussions.

VeryCD itself was down on the afternoon of Dec 9, which has led to massive speculation  that it would follow BTChina’s fate and be shut down permanently. Although initially VeryCD notified visitors to its site that it was experiencing technical difficulties — possibly due to a tremendous surge in traffic from users scrambling to download files as other P2P sites are closed — and would be up and running again by Thursday December 10. Well 12/10 has come and the site still remains down. This lends credence to a Southern Daily article that reported that further action against VeryCD and other P2P sites was highly likely, with another wave of sites receiving closure notifications on Dec 11th.

Needless to say there has been a huge uproar in the Chinese net space, as P2P downloading is the primary method for netizens to access the latest films and US TV series. Over the years the distribution chain has became so efficient that Chinese subtitled versions of the latest episodes of 24and other popular series are up on torrent sites a few hours after their initial showing.

Ironically, commentators think that the clamp down on P2P sites will lead to a revival of the pirated DVDs in China, which has taken quite a hit in recent years as consumers have migrated to downloading online. So in essence it’s saving one part of the piracy market at the expense of another.

  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in web.

Tagged with , , , , .


Baidu Launches “Twitter-like” Service iTieba, Then States That It’s Not Microblogging

The following is my latest post on Digital East Asia.

Two weeks ago Baidu, Inc. ((ADR) NASDAQ: BIDU) rolled out iTieba (in Chinese), an addition to the Tieba topic forums (think Google Groups, but much much more popular – Tieba literally means “post bar”). iTieba is a personal status page for Tieba users, a throw back to the original idea behind Twitter.

The site immediately caught the attention of the Chinese media, with many stating that Baidu has joined in the competition of microblogging platforms. Comparisons were immediately made to the Twitter clone launched by Sina Corporation ((USA) NASDAQ: SINA), as both prominently featured celebrity accounts. Sina is the master of using celebrities to push its services, as can be seen by its massively popular Sina blogs where it seems most Chinese stars from all walks of life reside (including Kaifu Lee, former head of Google Inc.’s (NASDAQ: GOOG) Chinese group). For Baidu’s iTieba, at launch it already had a number of popular celebrities such as Jet Li, and one pop artist has already amassed 1MM followers.

Interestingly, Shu Xun, the division manager of Baidu Tieba, went on the record on his Sina microblogging account to say that iTieba is not a microblogging service:

“Sina Microblog is very fun and I check it regularly. Thank you for all your interest in iTieba. iTieba is just the personal center of Tieba, and is a function of Tieba, so people who don’t use Tieba may not be used to it. According to my knowledge, Baidu has no plans for a microblogging service.”
– Shu Xun, Division Manager, Tieba

So it remains to be seen whether iTieba is a serious microblogging play from Baidu, or just a very Twitter-like new function for Tieba. Sina Microblog (which remains to be creatively named) has gained good traction in the past few months, both thanks to its celebrity strategy and the competition vacuum created when most of the leading Twitter clones in China were shut down for political reasons (the former leader, Fanfou, is still down, while Digu has returned). Microblogging is still a very new thing in China, and the potentially huge market is up for grabs, so it won’t be surprising if Baidu does want a piece of the action.

  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in web.

Tagged with , , , .


Shanda Buys China’s 3rd Biggest Video Site Ku6.com

The following is my latest post on Digital East Asia.

Late last week a press release announced that Hurray! Holding (NASDAQ: HRAY), which was acquired by Shanda Interactive Entertainment Ltd.(NASDAQ: SNDA) earlier this year, will acquire Ku6.com (in Chinese), the third largest video site in China. The deal is an all-stock transaction, and Ku6 will retain its brand as a subsidiary of Hurray!

Chinese media ifeng has provided updates on details of the deal, which is estimated to be $36.98MM in value (calculated using HRAY’s $5.11 stock price and the 723MM ADS shares it will issue to finance the deal). This is notably lower thanearlier reported figures, but it’s probably a good exit regardless for Ku6, which has really fallen behind its two bigger Chinese competitors, Tudou (in Chinese) and Youku (in Chinese). According to industry estimates, Youku and Tudou command 29.5% and 29% viewership market share respectively, while Ku6 has only 5.3%.

Ku6 has announced that it will ramp up its operations, aggressively increase its headcount and also move into a new office building in 2010. In addition, current employees can convert their options into HRAY shares, a portion of which can be cashed out immediately, “which was a pleasant surprise to the employees of a 3-year old firm that is yet to make a profit”, reports ifeng.

  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in web.

Tagged with , , , .


The Strategic Implications of Chrome OS

Excuse me for the grand title, but I’ve been writing too many marketing papers recently…

Google held a press release for Chrome OS today. All the major tech blog properties are covering it. Just check out the first page on techmeme and you’ll get a good rundown of all the discussions going on.

What I’d like to talk about is how Chrome OS might impact the computing market. Google has taken a page from Apple’s playbook by deciding that Chrome OS will be available only pre-shipped with certain devices (netbooks, at this point), as opposed to being an OS that you can get and install on whatever machine you have.

This is actually a big deal. By doing so, Google is moving away from the traditional PC hardware / software paradigm and moving towards a model more typically found in other consumer electronics – the future Chrome OS devices will be more similar to your TV or other home appliances than to your laptop or desktop, in that its feature-set is pre-defined and not customizable (unless you are a hacker). It will be a simple, straight-forward user experience – when you boot it up, all it shows will be the Chrome browser window.

Commentators are divided over the OS, but the differences really are due to very different vantage points. The infoworld article boldly titled “why Chrome OS will fail – big time” focuses on how Chrome OS is not a substitute for Windows or Mac, and thus claims it fails. Robert Scoble on the other hand focuses on how Chrome OS is really about low cost supplemental access to the web, and a competition over web standards and tools – HTML5 vs. proprietary frameworks like Flash or Silverlight.

My concern with Chrome OS is really about the bigger picture of netbooks – having never bought one myself (though quite tempted at one point when the EeePC first came out), I am still not a big believer. Netbooks are a niche category on a rapidly converging field, squeezed between ever-more powerful smartphones one the one end and laptops on the other. In one sense there’s a definite value proposition for it – a $100-200 device that you can just boot up and google a recipe while you’re cooking, or just do some casual browsing while you’re on the couch does have some marginal benefit, but the emphasis here is really on “marginal”.

For Chrome OS and netbooks to succeed, Google is really betting on a couple of big industry trends. One is that HTML5 adoption will be smooth and major web properties will convert to it, instead of running on proprietary platforms such as Adobe Flash or Microsoft Silverlight. Of course in this aspect Google does have some control, since it owns Youtube, so at least it can ensure that the biggest video site on the web will be compatible.

The second big trend is the wide-spread availability of wi-fi, since the device is Internet only. Google and its hardware partners can opt for 3G capabilities, but that’s a harder sell because of the additional telecom fees. In one sense, wi-fi is pretty widely available, but it’s far from ubiquitous, and while the device will still sell, people will talk about it less if they don’t use it on the go that conveniently. To a certain extent, this point is more of a technical issue, but Google and friends will have to come up with some solutions to make the device more usable.

In sum, Chrome OS is perhaps just the beginning of the future – a future where every device is a thin client to access the web and everything is stored in the cloud. It may be too early for its own good. Only time will tell.

  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in web.

Tagged with , .


Tencent Continues Run as Best-Performing Stock in HK This Year with Q3 Results

The following is my latest post on Digital East Asia.

Tencent Holdings Limited (HKG: 0700(ADR) PINK: TCEHY) announced impressive Q3 results on Nov. 11th (WSJ articleTencent PR). Quarterly revenues were USD 493.3 MM, 17% QoQ growth and 66% YoY growth; profit growth was even more impressive at USD 209.9 MM (42% net margin), 19% QoQ growth and 92% growth YoY. And as a Bloomberg articlenotes, Tencent has been the best performing stock in the Hang Seng Index this year.

Not all segments were growing though. While Internet VAS (QQ Zone, QQ Games) grew 22% QoQ and represents 78% of total revenue, Mobile VAS dropped 5% QoQ and accounted for 13% of revenue, and the outlook continues to be uncertain despite 3G networks being rolled out. Online advertising grew 20% QoQ and accounted for 9% of revenue, however, outlook for the next quarter seemed poor:

“Sustainability of the recovery in the advertising market is still uncertain… We also expect our search-based advertising revenues to reduce substantially due to amendments to service contract with our partner and the gradual transition into our self-developed search engine.”
– Mr. Ma Huateng, Chairman and CEO of Tencent Holdings Limited.


The ad recession issue aside, Tencent’s fundamentals look great. Active users of QQ increased to 485MM (in comparison, Facebook has >300 MM); peak concurrent users were 75MM (in comparison, Skype has around 20MM peak concurrent users). In terms of monetizing its massive user-base, Internet VAS paying subscribers reached 48MM, a 20% QoQ growth – this is one of the drivers of that impressive top-line growth.

The other driver is of course online games, which generated 58% of Internet VAS revenue (45% of total revenue) and grew 23% QoQ, though Tencent management noted that it was driven by strong summer holiday seasonality. Management also notes that they were facing strong competition from SNS casual games. As an interesting side-story to this, last month rumors surfaced (and then denied) that Tencent had acquired the developers of Happy Farm, the ridiculously addictive casual game that inspired Zynga’s FarmVille. Some people estimate that Tencent was grossing USD 8MM a month on Happy Farm, which would be strong reason to acquire the company while it was still small. (Tencent’s M&A head was actually at Berkeley Haas last week for recruiting, though he was very secretive about their deals, only commenting that they have been very active.)

  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in web.

Tagged with , , , , .


5 Reasons Why the iPhone “Flopped” In China

The following is my latest post on Digital East Asia.

It’s early days yet, but articles on Forbesand CNN last week have already began dissecting why Apple Inc.’s (NASDAQ: AAPL) iPhone had a rather spectacular failure of a launch in China. The widely quoted number from China Unicom (Hong Kong) Ltd. ((ADR) NYSE: CHU) is 5,000 units sold in 4 days, which is indeed an incredibly low number compared to first week of sales in US.

But is 5,000 units really that bad?

Before we start analyzing all the issues, some local perspective is needed here. The iPhone is an expensive machine. Even if it sold for half its price (the cheapest model is the 8GB 3G, at RMB 4,999 – USD 732), it would still be at the upper range  of the market. As some commentators have noted, that’s a third of the annual disposable income of urban residents in China. So by definition the iPhone is targeting at a very small addressable market.

According to an article (link in Chinese) on Phoenix TV’s news portal (interesting side-note – it’s called ifeng), an executive at Dopod (HTC) said that smartphones above RMB 3,000 (USD 432) in China usually have a lifecycle of 18 months and sell around 160,000 units. Another source said that the Samsung i908E, which launched at the end of last year to much fanfare as the first “deep partnership” (heavily customized) phone with China Mobile, has so far sold 120,000 units, or around 10,000 a month. The i908E is a direct competitor to the iPhone, with quite similar UI. Compared to those figures, the 5,000 in 4 days is not that bad.

And also according to ifeng, online and offline pre-orders of the iPhone totaled 140,000 units. When and how many of those pre-orders turn into real sales remains to be seen, but those are relatively respectful numbers.

What are the barriers to adoption?

Still, it’s obvious the launch fell well short of Apple’s expectations. And looking at it closer, a lot of things did go wrong and made the iPhone value proposition considerably less appealing. Here are five of those issues.

  1. The App Store, or lack thereof: The China specific app-store is much less interesting. There certainly aren’t 100,000 apps. In fact, this is not just an issue with the China market – the App Stores in most countries have less to offer compared to the US version, due to whatever legal reasons. Sophisticated users will simply register for the US store, but you need credit card with a US billing address (at times there have been promotions when you could register without a credit card, which is how I got my account back in China). As a side-note, I think it will be very interesting to see App Store sales breakdown by geographic markets – I’m pretty confident it’s very, very skewed towards the US market. And of course Chinese consumers just aren’t used to paying for software – popular iPhone fan forums all offer pirated apps to install on jailbroken devices.
  2. Lack of Wi-Fi module: Free wi-fi access is pretty prevalent in Beijing and Shanghai (all Starbucks and most coffee shops offer it for free), so having the wi-fi module disabled is a big blow, especially considering the 3G network isn’t that developed.
  3. Switching barriers: Currently in China you can’t take your number with you when you switch carriers, which is a prohibitive barrier for serious business users currently with China Mobile Limited ((ADR) NYSE: CHL), the world’s largest mobile carrier. And China Unicom didn’t help themselves either, by restricting their own existing subscribers from using their current SIM cards on the iPhone – in a technical decision which has dire strategic consequences, even Unicom users must switch to a “186″ number (a number that starts with 186) if they want to use the Unicom 3G network, the rationale being this allows Unicom to easily distinguish 2G and 3G users. Surely there are other ways of doing this?
  4. Pricing: Both the 24 month contract plans and the unit prices are steep for the market, especially considering gray market models have been available for a long time, and early adopters have all bought their phones. And Chinese users are really not used to the concept of 24 month contracts, and all the paperwork needed to get them (credit history infrastructure is very poor). Another interesting side-note here: cnbeta reports that (link in Chinese) China Unicom iPhones have already surfaced on the gray market, as hundreds of Unicom employees have signed 24 month contracts and then resold their phones – they can reimburse their monthly contracts, so they are literally getting a free phone to sell.
  5. Poor marketing execution: For all its marketing savvy, Apple couldn’t really help China Unicom. Example: China Unicom’s 3G portal doesn’t even list the iPhone as a model in the list of phones available. Instead iPhone is tucked away in a separate part of the site (links in Chinese), which is confusing to say the least.


Is Apple clueless about China?

The current story does have all the signs of a classic business school case, and at the heart of it is really the fact that Apple, like many other multinational companies, has underestimated the difficulty and complexity of success in the Chinese market.

In closing, I would like to share another side-note. ifeng reports that(link in Chinese) on the launch event held at the luxurious high end mall “The Place” in Beijing (which has one of the world’s largest LED screens), Greg Joswiak, Apple’s Vice President of iPod and iPhone Product Marketing, spent half an hour touting the phone’s various features.

By the end of his speech, the devout fans who have been standing and waiting in the rain had become so restless that they started to boo and ask him to step down. Not understanding what the consumers were saying, Greg thought they were cheering for the features of the phone, which in turn made the audience laugh at him.

Yu Yingtao, the GM of China Unicom’s distributor subsidiary, had to go into the crowd to console the audience and do some crisis management. Some middle aged ladies near the front of the line (pause and think about the consumer segment for a moment) expressed, “we have been waiting here for 4 hours, why is he still selling us the features that we all know? We are the end-users!”

That I guess, shows how clueless Apple is about China.

  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in mobile.

Tagged with , , , .